HomeSlots › More Fresh Fruits
Endorphina

More Fresh Fruits Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.5 / 5 — our rating
ESReviewed by Elin Sundqvist, Casino Analyst · Updated 18 Aug 2026
RTP
96.09%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
Endorphina

More Fresh Fruits doubles down on Endorphina's signature fruit formula, stacking extra symbols onto the classic cherries-and-sevens setup. RTP lands at 96.09%, a shade above the industry baseline. Medium volatility keeps the swings moderate — steady enough for grinding sessions, spiky enough to matter. Endorphina builds it with the studio's usual clean, retro-styled presentation.

How More Fresh Fruits plays

More Fresh Fruits runs a balanced medium-variance profile, the pacing most players default to. Wins arrive often enough to keep a session alive without the punishing droughts of a high-variance title.

Is 96.09% a good RTP?

96.09% puts More Fresh Fruits right on the industry standard of around 96% — a fair, typical return with no nasty surprises in the maths. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

More Fresh Fruits is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Solid 96.09% RTP, at or above standard
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From Endorphina, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Base-game pays can feel thin between features

Want to try More Fresh Fruits in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of More Fresh Fruits?
More Fresh Fruits has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.09%.
What is the volatility of More Fresh Fruits?
More Fresh Fruits is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes More Fresh Fruits?
More Fresh Fruits is developed by Endorphina.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →