HomeSlots › Lucky Streak 2
Endorphina

Lucky Streak 2 Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.5 / 5 — our rating
ESReviewed by Elin Sundqvist, Casino Analyst · Updated 18 Aug 2026
RTP
96.01%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
Endorphina

Classic fruit symbols get the sequel treatment in Lucky Streak 2, Endorphina's follow-up in its retro-styled series. The 96.01% RTP sits just above the industry average, paired with medium volatility that balances hit frequency against payout size. Cherries, sevens and bar icons keep the presentation firmly traditional, true to the old-school fruit-machine format.

How Lucky Streak 2 plays

With medium volatility, Lucky Streak 2 splits the difference: enough regular pays to stay engaged, enough upside in the features to keep a big hit on the table.

Is 96.01% a good RTP?

96.01% puts Lucky Streak 2 right on the industry standard of around 96% — a fair, typical return with no nasty surprises in the maths. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Lucky Streak 2 is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Solid 96.01% RTP, at or above standard
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From Endorphina, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Base-game pays can feel thin between features

Want to try Lucky Streak 2 in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Lucky Streak 2?
Lucky Streak 2 has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.01%.
What is the volatility of Lucky Streak 2?
Lucky Streak 2 is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes Lucky Streak 2?
Lucky Streak 2 is developed by Endorphina.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →