HomeSlots › Fusion Sugar Up
BGaming

Fusion Sugar Up Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.7 / 5 — our rating
MBReviewed by Marco Bianchi, Games Reviewer · Updated 14 Aug 2026
RTP
97%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
BGaming

A 97.0% RTP is the standout figure here, a full point above the typical 96% benchmark. The theme is pure sweets and food, with candy imagery running from the title through the reel symbols. BGaming develops the game, and that 97.0% return — not the sugary look — is what separates it from other candy slots.

How Fusion Sugar Up plays

With medium volatility, Fusion Sugar Up splits the difference: enough regular pays to stay engaged, enough upside in the features to keep a big hit on the table.

Is 97.0% a good RTP?

At 97.0%, Fusion Sugar Up returns noticeably more than the ~96% industry average. Over a long run that edge matters, and it's a genuine mark in the game's favour. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

Fusion Sugar Up is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Above-average 97.0% RTP
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From BGaming, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Bonus features can be slow to trigger

Want to try Fusion Sugar Up in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of Fusion Sugar Up?
Fusion Sugar Up has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 97.0%.
What is the volatility of Fusion Sugar Up?
Fusion Sugar Up is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes Fusion Sugar Up?
Fusion Sugar Up is developed by BGaming.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →