HomeSlots › 4 Horsemen Hold Hit
Spinomenal

4 Horsemen Hold Hit Slot Review

★★★★★ 4.6 / 5 — our rating
MBReviewed by Marco Bianchi, Games Reviewer · Updated 12 Aug 2026
RTP
96.85%
Volatility
Medium
Max Win
Provider
Spinomenal

War, famine, pestilence and death ride across this Spinomenal release, part of the studio's Hold Hit series. The hold-and-win mechanic locks special symbols in place and resets respins with each fresh landing. At 96.85%, the RTP sits well above the 96% mark most modern slots settle around — an unusually generous return for an apocalypse-themed title.

How 4 Horsemen Hold Hit plays

With medium volatility, 4 Horsemen Hold Hit splits the difference: enough regular pays to stay engaged, enough upside in the features to keep a big hit on the table.

Is 96.85% a good RTP?

At 96.85%, 4 Horsemen Hold Hit returns noticeably more than the ~96% industry average. Over a long run that edge matters, and it's a genuine mark in the game's favour. Bear in mind RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a promise for any single session.

Who should play it

4 Horsemen Hold Hit is an easy all-rounder — enough action for most players without demanding a specialist's bankroll or nerve. A sensible pick if you're not chasing extremes in either direction.

What we liked

  • Above-average 96.85% RTP
  • A balanced rhythm of pays (medium volatility)
  • From Spinomenal, a studio we rate

Worth knowing

  • Medium-volatility play: neither the calmest nor the wildest ride
  • Base-game pays can feel thin between features

Want to try 4 Horsemen Hold Hit in demo or real-money mode?

Play at Casumo →

Frequently asked questions

What is the RTP of 4 Horsemen Hold Hit?
4 Horsemen Hold Hit has a published return-to-player (RTP) of 96.85%.
What is the volatility of 4 Horsemen Hold Hit?
4 Horsemen Hold Hit is a medium-volatility slot, meaning a balanced rhythm of pays.
Who makes 4 Horsemen Hold Hit?
4 Horsemen Hold Hit is developed by Spinomenal.

How we review: we verify each game's RTP, volatility and maximum win against provider data, then assess variance, features and value. Ratings reflect our editorial judgement, not commercial arrangements. Read our full methodology →